The Arduino Opta Lite, Opta RS485 and Opta WiFi are much more alike than their names suggest.
All three share the same core PLC platform:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 |
STM32H747XI → Cortex-M7 up to 480 MHz → Cortex-M4 up to 240 MHz 8 × digital / analogue inputs 4 × normally-open relay outputs 10/100 Ethernet USB-C RTC secure element DIN-rail mounting Opta expansion port Arduino IDE Arduino PLC IDE |
The differences are almost entirely about communications:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 |
Opta Lite → Ethernet + USB-C Opta RS485 → Ethernet + USB-C + RS-485 Opta WiFi → Ethernet + USB-C + RS-485 + Wi-Fi + BLE |
That makes choosing between them much easier than comparing three completely different PLCs.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Opta Lite | Opta RS485 | Opta WiFi |
|---|---|---|---|
| SKU | AFX00003 | AFX00001 | AFX00002 |
| STM32H747 dual-core MCU | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 8 digital / analogue inputs | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 4 relay outputs | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 10/100 Ethernet | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| RS-485 | No | Half-duplex | Half-duplex |
| Modbus RTU | Not through native RS-485 | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | No | No | 2.4 GHz 802.11 b/g/n |
| Bluetooth LE | No | No | Yes |
| Modbus TCP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Secure element | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Expansion modules | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Arduino PLC IDE | Yes | Yes | Yes |
All Three Use the Same STM32H747
Every Opta variant uses:
|
1 2 3 4 |
STM32H747XI |
with:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
Cortex-M7 → up to 480 MHz Cortex-M4 → up to 240 MHz |
So buying the more expensive communications variant does not give you a faster PLC CPU.
All three have the same class of processing capability for:
- machine sequencing;
- logic control;
- Ethernet communication;
- data logging;
- predictive-maintenance algorithms;
- dual-core applications;
- Arduino and IEC 61131-3 programming.
The Core I/O Is Identical
All three variants provide:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
I1-I8 → 8 programmable inputs Relay 1-4 → 4 normally-open relay outputs |
The inputs can be used as:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
0-24 V digital inputs or 0-10 V analogue inputs |
and the four relay outputs are rated up to 10 A under the appropriate load conditions.
Opta Lite Does Not Mean Reduced I/O
The word:
|
1 2 3 4 |
Lite |
only refers to the connectivity set.
Opta Lite still has:
- the same processor;
- the same eight inputs;
- the same four relays;
- the same Ethernet port;
- the same USB-C interface;
- the same expansion connector;
- the same secure element;
- the same PLC programming capability.
Ethernet Is Standard on Every Opta
All three models include:
|
1 2 3 4 |
10/100BASE-T Ethernet |
with an onboard RJ45 connector.
This means even the cheapest Lite model can support:
- Modbus TCP;
- HTTP;
- MQTT;
- Arduino Cloud over wired Ethernet;
- local dashboards;
- TCP/IP industrial communication.
Why Ethernet Makes Opta Lite More Capable Than It Looks
If your control cabinet already has wired Ethernet, Opta Lite can handle a large percentage of connected PLC applications without either RS-485 or Wi-Fi.
Examples include:
- Modbus TCP energy meters;
- Ethernet HMIs;
- SCADA connections;
- MQTT gateways;
- cloud-connected equipment;
- LAN-based remote monitoring.
Opta RS485 Adds One Important Industrial Interface
The RS485 model adds:
|
1 2 3 4 |
half-duplex RS-485 |
through:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
A(-) B(+) GND |
terminals.
This enables direct connection to:
- Modbus RTU devices;
- variable-frequency drives;
- energy meters;
- industrial sensors;
- remote I/O modules;
- serial gateways.
RS-485 Is the Main Reason to Step Up from Lite
If your machine contains even one important:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
Modbus RTU or RS-485 |
device, the RS485 variant avoids the need for an external USB/serial or Ethernet/RS-485 gateway.
Opta RS485 Has No Wi-Fi
This is worth making explicit.
Opta RS485 gives you:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
Ethernet USB-C RS-485 |
but not:
|
1 2 3 4 5 |
Wi-Fi Bluetooth |
It is intended for fully wired automation systems.
Opta WiFi Includes Everything in the RS485 Model
Opta WiFi includes:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
Ethernet USB-C RS-485 Wi-Fi Bluetooth Low Energy |
so you do not sacrifice the industrial serial interface to gain wireless networking.
Wi-Fi Specification
The WiFi model supports:
|
1 2 3 4 5 |
2.4 GHz 802.11 b/g/n |
through the onboard wireless subsystem.
It is not a dual-band Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6 platform.
Bluetooth Low Energy
Opta WiFi also includes:
|
1 2 3 4 |
Bluetooth Low Energy |
which can be useful for:
- local commissioning;
- wireless sensors;
- short-range configuration;
- mobile interaction;
- BLE peripherals.
Wi-Fi Is Useful When Ethernet Is Impractical
Opta WiFi makes sense when:
- there is no Ethernet drop at the machine;
- the machine moves or is difficult to cable;
- temporary installations need connectivity;
- cloud access is needed without changing the LAN infrastructure;
- BLE devices need to be integrated locally.
Wired Ethernet Is Still Preferable in Many PLC Installations
Even if you buy Opta WiFi, industrial control traffic often still belongs on Ethernet where practical because wired networking normally provides:
- predictable connectivity;
- less RF interference;
- simpler troubleshooting;
- easier segmentation;
- more stable latency.
Wi-Fi is then available for:
- maintenance;
- secondary telemetry;
- cloud connectivity;
- commissioning;
- temporary access.
All Three Support Modbus TCP
Because Ethernet is standard on the entire Opta range, all three can participate in:
|
1 2 3 4 |
Modbus TCP |
networks.
This means Opta Lite can still be an industrial Modbus controller even without RS-485.
Only RS485 and WiFi Support Native Modbus RTU Wiring
Modbus RTU normally runs over RS-485.
Therefore:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 |
Opta Lite → Modbus TCP yes → native Modbus RTU no Opta RS485 → Modbus TCP yes → Modbus RTU yes Opta WiFi → Modbus TCP yes → Modbus RTU yes |
No Onboard RS-485 Termination
On both RS-485-capable variants, Arduino specifies there is no onboard termination resistor:
|
1 2 3 4 5 |
half-duplex RS-485 without termination resistor |
If the Opta is installed at the end of the bus, add an appropriate external termination resistor according to the network design.
Do Not Choose WiFi Just Because You Want Arduino Cloud
Arduino Cloud can also be reached through:
|
1 2 3 4 |
Ethernet |
which exists on every Opta.
So:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
Cloud connectivity does not automatically require Opta WiFi |
If Ethernet is already available, Lite or RS485 may be completely sufficient.
Security Is the Same Across the Family
All Opta variants include the:
|
1 2 3 4 |
ATECC608B |
secure element.
This provides hardware support for:
- protected key storage;
- device identity;
- certificates;
- secure provisioning;
- cloud authentication;
- secure boot workflows.
The WiFi version is therefore not the only secure model.
All Three Have the Same Relay Outputs
The four normally-open relays are identical across Lite, RS485 and WiFi.
The published maximum is:
|
1 2 3 4 |
10 A per relay |
under the appropriate load and voltage conditions.
The relay section does not improve when moving to a higher Opta variant.
All Three Use the Same 12-24 V Supply
The Opta family operates from:
|
1 2 3 4 |
12-24 V DC |
making all three equally suitable for:
- 12 V panels;
- 24 V industrial cabinets;
- building automation;
- machine control.
All Three Have the Same DIN-Rail Form Factor
Mechanically, choosing RS-485 or Wi-Fi does not require a different enclosure strategy.
All three are designed around the same compact DIN-rail PLC format.
All Three Support Expansion Modules
The proprietary side connector is present across the range.
Arduino documents support for up to:
|
1 2 3 4 |
5 Opta expansion modules |
depending on the module mix and system configuration.
Available expansions include digital and analogue modules.
Expansion Is Independent of Connectivity Variant
You do not need Opta WiFi to use expansion modules.
A Lite installation can still grow into a large I/O system with:
- additional digital inputs;
- relay outputs;
- solid-state outputs;
- analogue inputs;
- analogue outputs.
All Three Support Arduino IDE
Every model can run conventional Arduino C/C++ applications using the standard Arduino environment.
This is useful when the application is better described as embedded firmware than as PLC logic.
All Three Support Arduino PLC IDE
All three models also support IEC 61131-3-style programming through Arduino PLC IDE.
Current supported languages include:
- Ladder Diagram;
- Structured Text;
- Function Block Diagram;
- Sequential Function Chart;
- Instruction List in the Arduino PLC environment.
Performance Is Identical
There is no reason to choose Opta WiFi because you expect more:
- CPU speed;
- RAM;
- relay capacity;
- analogue resolution;
- PLC execution performance.
The main processor and control I/O platform are shared.
Opta Lite: Best Fit
Choose Lite when the project needs:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
Ethernet USB-C local I/O relay control PLC logic cloud over Ethernet |
but does not need:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
RS-485 Wi-Fi BLE |
Typical applications include:
- Ethernet-connected building automation;
- local pump control;
- lighting control;
- LAN-connected machinery;
- Modbus TCP installations.
Opta RS485: Best Fit
Choose RS485 when the project adds:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
Modbus RTU VFDs energy meters serial sensors remote RS-485 I/O |
but the installation remains fully wired.
This is often the most logical industrial variant because RS-485 remains extremely common in control cabinets.
Opta WiFi: Best Fit
Choose WiFi when you need everything in the RS485 model plus:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
wireless LAN BLE peripherals wireless commissioning cloud access without Ethernet |
Typical examples include:
- retrofit installations;
- remote machines without Ethernet cabling;
- mobile or temporary equipment;
- BLE sensor gateways;
- wireless cloud-connected control panels.
Which Model for Modbus TCP?
Any Opta.
All three have Ethernet.
Which Model for Modbus RTU?
Opta RS485 or Opta WiFi.
Both provide native half-duplex RS-485.
Which Model for Arduino Cloud?
Any Opta can reach network services over Ethernet.
Opta WiFi additionally allows Cloud access over wireless networking.
Which Model for a VFD?
If the drive uses:
|
1 2 3 4 |
Modbus RTU over RS-485 |
choose RS485 or WiFi.
If the drive uses:
|
1 2 3 4 |
Modbus TCP over Ethernet |
any model can work.
Which Model for an Energy Meter?
It depends on the meter interface:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
RS-485 / Modbus RTU → RS485 or WiFi Ethernet / Modbus TCP → Lite, RS485 or WiFi |
Which Model for a Remote Installation?
If wired Ethernet is unavailable, Opta WiFi is the only member of the family with integrated wireless networking.
Which Model for a Secure Wired Cabinet?
Lite or RS485 may actually be preferable when:
- wireless radios are prohibited;
- cybersecurity policy requires wired-only networking;
- the control network is physically isolated;
- RF communication is undesirable.
Do Not Automatically Buy the Most Expensive Model
Because the control hardware is shared, buying WiFi provides no benefit if you will:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
disable Wi-Fi never use BLE never use RS-485 |
In that case Opta Lite performs the same PLC logic through Ethernet.
But Avoid External Adapters When the Feature Is Predictable
The opposite mistake is buying Lite when the design is likely to need RS-485 later.
An external:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
USB-to-RS485 or Ethernet-to-RS485 |
adapter adds:
- another device;
- more wiring;
- another power supply path;
- more commissioning;
- another failure point.
If Modbus RTU is likely, the native RS485 version is normally the cleaner architecture.
Decision Table
| Requirement | Recommended variant |
|---|---|
| Basic PLC with Ethernet | Opta Lite |
| Modbus TCP only | Opta Lite |
| RS-485 / Modbus RTU | Opta RS485 or WiFi |
| VFD over RS-485 | Opta RS485 or WiFi |
| Wireless LAN | Opta WiFi |
| BLE sensors | Opta WiFi |
| Cloud via Ethernet | Any Opta |
| Wired-only industrial cabinet | Lite or RS485 |
| Maximum connectivity flexibility | Opta WiFi |
| Lowest unnecessary hardware | Choose only the interfaces actually required |
Quick Reference
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 |
Shared by all three STM32H747XI M7 @ 480 MHz M4 @ 240 MHz 8 × digital/analog inputs 4 × NO relays 10/100 Ethernet USB-C ATECC608B secure element RTC DIN rail Opta expansion port Arduino IDE Arduino PLC IDE Opta Lite AFX00003 Ethernet USB-C no RS-485 no Wi-Fi no BLE Opta RS485 AFX00001 Ethernet USB-C half-duplex RS-485 no Wi-Fi no BLE Opta WiFi AFX00002 Ethernet USB-C half-duplex RS-485 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n Bluetooth Low Energy |
Final Thoughts
The Opta range is deliberately simple:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 |
Lite → wired Ethernet PLC RS485 → wired Ethernet PLC + industrial serial fieldbus WiFi → Ethernet PLC + RS-485 + wireless networking + BLE |
All three have the same processor, the same eight inputs, the same four relays, the same security hardware and the same expansion capability.
So the correct model depends almost entirely on how the PLC must communicate with the rest of the system.
For a wired Ethernet-only installation, Opta Lite is already a complete PLC.
For conventional industrial devices such as VFDs, meters and Modbus RTU sensors, Opta RS485 is the natural step up.
For installations that also need wireless LAN, BLE sensors or easier cloud connectivity without Ethernet cabling, Opta WiFi adds those features without giving up RS-485.
For the terminal-level details shared by all three models, see our Arduino Opta pinout and I/O guide.